An individual seeking certain records disclosed by a party in another litigation must show that such records are “in controversy” in his or her action
A teacher [Teacher] at a State correctional facility alleged that she had been subjected to unlawful discrimination based upon sex, age and disability and then subjected to retaliation for complaining about such alleged discrimination by her supervisor.
A teacher [Teacher] at a State correctional facility alleged that she had been subjected to unlawful discrimination based upon sex, age and disability and then subjected to retaliation for complaining about such alleged discrimination by her supervisor.
Supreme Court denied Teacher’s motion seeking the production of her supervisor’s medical records, which decision was sustained by the Appellate Division.
The Appellate Division explained that “[e]ven assuming, arguendo, that [the supervisor] waived the physician-patient privilege with respect to those records by disclosing them in an action commenced by [her] in federal court, we conclude that [Teacher] failed to meet her initial burden of making an evidentiary showing that [the supervisor’s] medical condition ‘in controversy’ in this action,” citing CPLR §3121[a].
The Appellate Division commented that “[t]he fact that [the supervisor] affirmatively placed her medical condition in controversy in the related action she commenced in federal court does not relieve [Teacher] of her initial burden herein.”
The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2013/2013_00853.htm